Will Federal Government Know if You Get Mecial Recommendation
MEDICAL-USE UPDATE: As of Feb 3, 2022 37 states, four territories and the District of Columbia allow the medical apply of cannabis products.
In November 2020, voters in Mississippi passed a ballot initiative to let for medical use, but information technology was overturned by the country supreme court on May fourteen, 2021. The legislature passed new legislation which was signed past the governor Feb. 2, 2022. See Table one below.
NONMEDICAL/Developed-Apply UPDATE: As of November 29, 2021, 18 states, two territories and the District of Columbia have enacted legislation to regulate cannabis for nonmedical employ.
- Voters in Arizona, Montana, New Jersey and South Dakota canonical measures to regulate cannabis for nonmedical use.
- On February. eight, 2021, South Dakota Circuit Judge Christina Klinger ruled that the measure was unconstitutional. The South Dakota Supreme Court upheld this determination on Nov 24, 2021 by a vote of 4-1.
- New Jersey's governor signed enacting legislation on March ane, 2021.
- New York'south legislature and governor enacted AB 1248/SB 854 on March 31, 2021.
- The Virginia Full general Assembly passed legislation on Feb. 27 and approved the governor's amendments on April vii, 2021.
- The New United mexican states legislature passed legislation on March 31 and the governor signed it on April 12, 2021.
- The Connecticut General Assembly passed SB 1201 on June 17 and the governor signed information technology on June 22, 2021.
- These actions bring the number of states with nonmedical (adult-apply) regulated cannabis to xviii, plus ii territories and the District of Columbia (D.C. does not regulate nonmedical sales).
- This total does NOT include S Dakota'due south court-over-turned measure out.
Please meet Tabular array ane below for more information.
A total of 37 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.Southward. Virgin Islands regulate cannabis for medical use by qualified individuals.
Delight run across Table 1 below for more information.
Canonical measures in 11 states allow the apply of "depression THC, loftier cannabidiol (CBD)" products for medical reasons in express situations or equally a legal defence force. (Run across Table 2 beneath for more information). Low-THC programs are non counted as comprehensive medical cannabis programs. NCSL uses criteria similar to other organizations tracking this consequence to determine if a program is "comprehensive":
- Protection from criminal penalties for using cannabis for a medical purpose.
- Access to cannabis through dwelling cultivation, dispensaries or some other system that is probable to be implemented.
- It allows a diversity of strains or products, including those with more than "low THC."
- It allows either smoking or vaporization of some kind of cannabis products, found textile or extract.
- Is non a express trial program. (Nebraska has a trial program that is not open to the public.)
February 3, 2022: This map DOES NOT reflect the Mississippi legislation signed on Feb. two, 2022. It will exist updated soon.
* = Measures approved past voters in Mississippi for medical employ and S Dakota for nonmedical use were overturned in 2021. The Mississippi legislature passed new medical cannabis legislation which the governor signed on Feb. ii, 2022.
Please run across Table i below for more information.
Medical Uses of Cannabis
In response to California's Prop 215, the Institute of Medicine issued a report that examined potential therapeutic uses for cannabis. The report constitute that: "Scientific data indicate the potential therapeutic value of cannabinoid drugs, primarily THC, for pain relief, control of nausea and vomiting, and appetite stimulation; smoked marijuana, however, is a crude THC delivery organisation that also delivers harmful substances. The psychological effects of cannabinoids, such as anxiety reduction, sedation, and euphoria tin influence their potential therapeutic value. Those furnishings are potentially undesirable for certain patients and situations and beneficial for others. In improver, psychological effects can complicate the interpretation of other aspects of the drug's outcome."
Further studies accept plant that marijuana is effective in relieving some of the symptoms of HIV/AIDS, cancer, glaucoma, and multiple sclerosis.1
In early 2017, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released a report based on the review of over x,000 scientific abstracts from cannabis health research. They besides made 100 conclusions related to wellness and suggest ways to amend cannabis research.
State vs Federal Perspective
At the federal level, cannabis remains classified as a Schedule I substance nether the Controlled Substances Act, where Schedule I substances are considered to accept a high potential for dependency and no accepted medical use, making distribution of cannabis a federal criminal offense. In October of 2009, the Obama Administration sent a memo to federal prosecutors encouraging them non to prosecute people who distribute cannabis for medical purposes in accordance with state law.
In late August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice announced an update to their marijuana enforcement policy. The statement read that while cannabis remains illegal federally, the USDOJ expects states like Colorado and Washington to create "stiff, land-based enforcement efforts.... and volition defer the right to challenge their legalization laws at this time." The department also reserves the right to claiming the states at any time they feel it's necessary.
More recently, in Jan 2018, quondam Attorney General Sessions issued a Marijuana Enforcement Memorandum that rescinded the Cole Memorandum, and allows federal prosecutors to decide how to prioritize enforcement of federal cannabis laws. Specifically, the Sessions memorandum directs U.South. Attorneys to "weigh all relevant considerations, including federal law enforcement priorities gear up by the Attorney General, the seriousness of the crime, the deterrent effect of criminal prosecution, and the cumulative impact of particular crimes on the customs." Text of the memo can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-problems-memo-marijuana-enforcement
NCSL's policy on land cannabis laws can be found under Additional Resources beneath.
Arizona and the District of Columbia voters passed initiatives to let for medical use, just to take them overturned. In 1998, voters in the District of Columbia passed Initiative 59. Nonetheless, Congress blocked the initiative from becoming police force. In 2009, Congress reversed its previous determination, allowing the initiative to become constabulary. The D.C. Council and then put Initiative 59 on hold temporarily and unanimously approved modifications to the law.
Before passing Proposition 203 in 2010, Arizona voters originally passed a election initiative in 1996. However, the initiative stated that doctors would be allowed to write a "prescription" for cannabis. Since cannabis is a Schedule I substance, federal police prohibits its prescription, making the initiative invalid. Medical cannabis "prescriptions" are more oft called "recommendations" or "referrals" because of the federal prescription prohibition.
States with medical cannabis laws generally have some form of patient registry, which may provide some protection confronting abort for possession up to a sure amount of products for personal medicinal apply.
Some of the most mutual policy questions regarding medical cannabis include how to regulate its recommendation, dispensing, and registration of approved patients. Some small-scale cannabis growers or are oftentimes called "caregivers" and may abound a certain number of plants per patient. This upshot may also be regulated on a local level, in addition to any state regulation.
State (click state proper name to jump to programme information) | Statutory Language (year | Patient Registry or ID cards | Allows Dispensaries | Specifies Conditions | Recognizes Patients from other states | State Allows for Retail Sales/Nonmedical Adult Use |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | SB46 (2021) | Yes | Yep | Yes | No | |
Alaska | Measure 8 (1998) SB 94 (1999) Statute Title 17, Chapter 37 | Yes | Yes | Aye | No, just adults 21 and older may purchase at nonmedical retail dispensaries. | Election Measure 2 (2014) Marijuana Regulations |
Arizona | Proposition 203 (2010) | Yes | Yeah | Yes | Yes, for AZ-approved conditions, but not for dispensary purchases. | Proposition 207 (2020) |
Arkansas | Issue 6 (2016) | Yep | Aye | Yes | Yes | |
California | Proffer 215 (1996) SB 420 (2003) | Yeah | Yes (cooperatives and collectives) | No | No | Proposition 64 (2016) |
Colorado Medical plan info -Nonmedical utilize info | Amendment 20 (2000) | Yeah | Yeah | Yes | No | Subpoena 64 (2012) Chore Force Implementation Recommendations (2013) Analysis of CO Subpoena 64 (2013) Colorado Marijuana Sales and Revenue enhancement Reports 2014 "Edibles" regulation measure FAQ virtually CO cannabis laws by the Denver Postal service. |
Connecticut | HB 5389 (2012) Nonmedical utilize legislation SB 1201 (2021) | Yeah | Yep | Yes | SB 1201 (2021) | |
Delaware | SB 17 (2011) | Aye | Yes | Yes | Yep, for DE-approved conditions. | |
Commune of Columbia | Initiative 59 (Passed by voters but blocked past the Barr Amendment in 1998) L18-0210 or Act B18-622 (2010) | Aye | Yes | Yes | Initiative 71 (2014) | |
Florida | Amendment 2 (2016) | Yeah | Yes | Yes | No | |
Guam | Proposal 14A Approved in Nov. 2014, fully operational.- home growing currently allowed until dispensaries open up Draft rules released in July 2015 Nonmedical use- 2019 Bill No. 32-35 signed by governor in April, 2019 | Yes | Aye | Yep | No | Yes. Nonmedical use- 2019 Bill No. 32-35 signed by governor in April, 2019 |
Hawaii | SB 862 (2000) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
Illinois | HB 1 (2013)Eff. 1/1/2014 Rules Nonmedical use legalization SB 0007 bill passed legislature May, 2019, signed by governor June 25, 2019, Effective Jan. ane, 2020. | Yep | Yes | Yep | No | Mensurate canonical by legislature in May, 2019, signed by governor June 25, 2019. Effective Jan. one, 2020. |
Louisiana | SB 271 (2017) (not yet in effect) | No | Yes | Yep | No | |
Maine | Question ii (1999) LD 611 (2002) Question 5 (2009) LD 1811 (2010) LD 1296 (2011) | Aye | Yep | Yes | Yes, only non for clinic purchases. Adults 21 and older may purchase from nonmedical retail dispensaries. | Question one (2016) page 4 Chapter 409 (2018) |
Maryland | HB 702 (2003) SB 308 (2011) HB 180/SB 580 (2013) HB 1101- Chapter 403 (2013) SB 923 (signed 4/14/fourteen) HB 881- similar to SB 923 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
Massachusetts | Question three (2012) Regulations (2013) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Question 4 (2016) |
Michigan | Proposal 1 (2008) | Yes | Yes | Yeah | Yeah, for legal protection of possession, just not for dispensary purchases. Adults 21 and older may purchase from nonmedical retail dispensaries. | Proposal 18-1 (2018) |
Minnesota | SF 2471, Chapter 311 (2014) | Yes | Aye, express, liquid extract products only | Yes | No | |
Mississippi | SB 2095 (2022) Initiative 65 (2020) News: Mississippi Supreme Court Overturns Medical Marijuana Amendment 65 | Aye | Yes | Yes | Yes- must use to MDOH. | |
Missouri | Amendment 2 (2018) | Yes | Yes | Yeah | Yes | |
Montana | Initiative 148 (2004) SB 423 (2011) Initiative 182 (2016) | Yes Yes | Yes Yep | Yeah Yeah | No | Initiative 190 (2020) |
Nevada | Question nine (2000) NRS 453A NAC 453A | Yes | Aye | Yes | Yes, if the other land's program are "essentially similar." Patients must fill out Nevada paperwork. Adults 21 and older may purchase at nonmedical retail dispensaries. | Question ii (2016) page 25 |
New Hampshire | HB 573 (2013) HB 89 (2021) | Yes | Aye | Yes | Yes, with a note from their dwelling country, but they cannot buy through dispensaries. | |
New Bailiwick of jersey | SB 119 (2009) Plan information | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Public Question 1 passed by voters in 2020 to allow legislature to enact legislation NJ AB 21 passed legislature, signed by governor March 1, 2021 |
New Mexico | SB 523 (2007) Medical Cannabis Programme | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | HB 2 Cannabis regulation act passed legislature March 31, 2021 and signed past governor on 4/12/21. |
New York | A6357 (2014) Signed past governor seven/5/14 | Yes | Yes- Ingested doses may not comprise more than than 10 mg of THC, product may not be combusted (smoked). | Yes | No | AB 1248A/SB 854 passed legislature, signed past governor on March 31, 2021. |
Due north Dakota | Measure v (2016) NDCC 19-24.one NDAC 33-44 | Yes | Aye | Yes | No | |
Northern Mariana Islands | Does non have a medical program. | Yes, HB 20-178 HD 4- Public Law twenty-66 (2018) | ||||
Ohio | HB 523 (2016) Canonical by legislature, signed by governor 6/eight/xvi | Yes | Yes | Yeah | Aye- If approved past the Lath of Pharmacy on a land-by-state footing. | |
Oklahoma | SQ 788 Canonical past voters on 6/26/eighteen | Yes | Yep | Yes, but list was not included in the initial ballot mensurate. | Yep but must apply as a temporary patient | |
Oregon | Oregon Medical Marijuana Human action (1998) SB 161 (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, merely adults over 21 may buy at adult retail dispensaries. | Measure 91 (2014) |
Pennsylvania | SB 3 (2016) Signed by governor 4/17/16 | Yes | Yes | Aye | No | |
Puerto Rico | Public Health Department Regulation 155 (2016) in Spanish | Yes | Yes- Cannot be smoked | Yep | Yep | |
Rhode Island | S 710 B (2006)- Legislature overturned governor's veto. SB 791 (2007) SB 185 (2009) | Yes | Yeah | Yep | Yes | |
South Dakota *Nonmedical measure out ruled unconstitutional as of Feb. 9, 2021. | Initiated Measure out 26 (2020) News: Court rules measure unconstitutional February. eight, 2021 News: AG volition non entreatment court decision Feb. 12, 2021 News: Legislature considering legislation Feb. 9, 2021 | Aye | Yes | Yes | Yet to be adamant | Amendment A (2020) OVERTURNED BY COURTS Feb. eight, 2021 NOT COUNTED IN STATE TALLY ABOVE |
US Virgin Islands | SB 135 (2017) signed by governor i/19/19 | |||||
Utah | Prop two (2018) replaced by HB 3001 HB 3001 2018- Third Special Session | Yes | Yes | Yeah | Aye | |
Vermont | SB 76 (2004) SB vii (2007) SB 17 (2011) H.511 (2018) | Yes | Yes | Aye | No, only adults 21 years quondam and older may buy from the nonmedical market. | H.511 approved past legislature, signed by governor 1/22/18. Constructive July one, 2018. S.54 (2020) establishes sales regulations. Effective Oct. 7, 2020. Governor's letter re: Southward. 54, going into effect without his signature. Additional info: Governor's Marijuana Advisory Commission Terminal Report- December, 2018 |
Virginia | H 1460 (2020) Due south 646 (2020) H 1617 (2020) S 976 (2020) Legislative Timeline (2020) Board of Pharmacy overview | Yes | Yes | No | No, but allows for temporary residents to apply with blessing from the Lath of Pharmacy. | Yes, legislature canonical HB2312 and SB1406.Signed by governor iv/7/21. |
Washington | Initiative 692(1998) SB 5798 (2010) SB 5073 (2011) | Registry is voluntary. | Yes, approved as of Nov. 2012, stores opened in July, 2014. | Yes | No, simply adults 21 and older may purchase at nonmedical retail dispensaries. | Initiative 502 (2012) WAC Marijuana rules: Affiliate 314-55 WAC FAQ about WA cannabis laws by the Seattle Times. |
West Virginia | SB 386 (2017) | Yes | Yes. No whole flower/cannot exist smoked but tin be vaporized. | Yeah | No, only may permit their patients who are terminally ill to buy in other states. WV does not recognize other state cards. |
*The links and resources are provided for information purposes only. NCSL does not endorse the views expressed in whatever of the manufactures linked from this folio.
Land | Program Proper noun and Statutory Language (year) | Patient Registry or ID cards | Dispensaries or Source of Product(southward) | Specifies Conditions | Recognizes Patients from other states | Definition of Products Immune | Allows for Legal Defence | Allowed for Minors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama (SB46 of 2021 created a new medical cannabis law enacted on May 17, 2021 and is listed in Table 1.) | SB 174 "Carly's Law" (Act 2014-277) Allows University of Alabama Birmingham to carry effectiveness research using low-THC products for treating seizure disorders for up to 5 years. HB 61 (2016) Leni's Law allows more than physicians to refer patients to use CBD for more conditions. | No | Provides legal defense force for possession and/or utilise of CBD oil. Does not create an in-state production method. | Yes, debilitating epileptic conditions, life-threatening seizures, wasting syndrome, chronic pain, nausea, muscle spasms, any other sever status resistant to conventional medicine. | No | Extracts that are depression THC= below 3% THC | Aye | Yes |
Florida (NEW comprehensive program approved in 2016, included in table higher up) | Empathetic Medical Cannabis Human activity of 2014 CS for SB 1030 (2014) Patient handling data and outcomes will be nerveless and used for intractable babyhood epilepsy inquiry | Aye | Aye, 5 registered nurseries across the state by region, which have been in business at least thirty years in Florida. | Yes, cancer, medical status or seizure disorders that chronically produces symptoms that can exist alleviated by low-THC products | No | Cannabis with low THC= below .eight% THC and above 10% CBD by weight | Yes, with approving from 2 doctors | |
Georgia | HB 1 (2015) (signed by governor 4/sixteen/15) | Yes | Law allows Academy System of Georgia to develop a lot THC oil clinical research program that meets FDA trial compliance. | Yes, end stage cancer, ALS, MS, seizure disorders, Crohn'south, mitochondrial disease, Parkinson's, Sickle Cell disease | No | Cannabis oils with low THC= below 5% THC and at least an equal corporeality of CDB. | Yes | Yeah |
Idaho- VETOED BY GOVERNOR | SB 1146(VETOED by governor 4/16/fifteen) | No | Doesn't define. | The possessor has, or is a parent or guardian of a person that has, cancer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, seizure disorders, multiple sclerosis, Crohn's illness, mitochondrial disease, fibromyalgia, Parkinson's disease or sickle cell affliction; | No | Is composed of no more than three-tenths percent (0.3%) tetrahydrocannabidiol past weight; is composed of at least fifteen (15) times more cannabidiol than tetrahydrocannabidiol past weight; and contains no other psychoactive substance. | Yes | Yeah |
Indiana | HB 1148 (2017) | Aye | Doesn't define. | Treatment resistant epilepsy. | No | At least v percentage CBD by weight. No more than .3 percentage THC by weight. | Yes | Aye |
Iowa | SF 2360, Medical Cannabidiol Act of 2014 (Constructive 7/one/xiv and repealed in 2017 and replaced) HF 524 of 2017 at present Section 124E | Yes | Aye | Yep | Yes, for possession or use merely, non for purchasing CBD in Iowa. | Less than iii percent THC | Yes | Yep |
Kentucky | SB 124 (2014) Clara Madeline Gilliam Act Exempt cannabidiol from the definition of marijuana and allows it to exist administered past a public university or school of medicine in Kentucky for clinical trial or expanded admission programme approved past the FDA. | No | Universities in Kentucky with medical schools that are able to get a enquiry trial. Doesn't allow for in-state production of CBD product. | Intractable seizure disorders | No | No, only "cannabidiol". | ||
Mississippi (Overturned Amendment 65 from 2020 included in table above.) | HB 1231 "Harper Grace's Police force" 2014 | All provided through National Center for Natural Products Research at the Univ. of Mississippi and dispensed by the Dept. of Pharmacy Services at the Univ. of Mississippi Medical Eye | Yes, debilitating epileptic status or related disease | No | "CBD oil" - processed cannabis found extract, oil or resin that contains more than than fifteen% cannabidiol, or a dilution of the resin that contains at to the lowest degree 50 milligrams of cannabidiol (CBD) per milliliter, but not more than half of one per centum (0.v%) of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) | Yes, if an authorized patient or guardian | Yes | |
Missouri (NEW comprehensive program approved in 2018, included in table to a higher place) | HB 2238 (2014) | Yes | Aye, creates cannabidiol oil care centers and cultivation and production facilities/laboratories. | Yes, intractable epilepsy that has not responded to three or more other treatment options. | No | "Hemp extracts" equal or less than .3% THC and at to the lowest degree 5% CBD past weight. | Yep | Yes |
Due north Carolina | HB 1220 (2014) Epilepsy Culling Handling Human activity- Pilot Report HB 766 (2015) Removes Pilot Report designation | Yeah | University research studies with a hemp extract registration card from the state DHHS or obtained from another jurisdiction that allows removal of the products from the country. | Yeah, intractable epilepsy | No | "Hemp extracts" with less than nine-tenths of i percent (0.9%) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by weight. Is composed of at least 5 percent (5%) cannabidiol by weight. Contains no other psychoactive substance. | Yes | Yes |
Oklahoma (NEW comprehensive medical programme approved in 2018 and listed to a higher place) | HB 2154 (2015) | Yes | No in-land production allowed, so products would take to exist brought in. Any formal distribution system would require federal approval. | People under 18 (minors) Minors with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, Dravet Syndrome, or other severe epilepsy that is not adequately treated past traditional medical therapies | No | A grooming of cannabis with no more than .3% THC in liquid form. | Yes | Yeah, but immune for minors |
S Carolina | SB 1035 (2014) Medical Cannabis Therapeutic Treatment Human action- Julian's Police force | Yes | Must use CBD production from an canonical source; and (two) approved by the United states Food and Drug Administration to be used for handling of a status specified in an investigational new drug application. -The principal investigator and any subinvestigator may receive cannabidiol direct from an approved source or authorized distributor for an approved source for apply in the expanded access clinical trials. Some take interpreted the law to allow patients and caregivers to produce their ain products. | Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, Dravet Syndrome, also known as astringent myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, or any other form of refractory epilepsy that is not adequately treated past traditional medical therapies. | No | Cannabidiol or derivative of marijuana that contains 0.9% THC and over 15% CBD, or least 98 percent cannabidiol (CBD) and not more than 0.ninety% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by book that has been extracted from marijuana or synthesized in a laboratory | Yep | Yeah |
Tennessee | SB 2531 (2014) | Researchers need to runway patient information and outcomes | Only products produced by Tennessee Tech University. Patients may possess low THC oils simply if they are purchased "legally in the United states of america and outside of Tennessee," from an assumed medical cannabis state, however near states practice not permit products to get out the state. | Yes, intractable seizure conditions. | No | "Cannabis oil" with less than .9% THC every bit office of a clinical research study. | Yes | Yep |
HB 197 (2015) | No | Allows for legal defense for having the product as long equally it was obtained legally in the Us or other medical cannabis country. | Yes, intractable seizure conditions. | No | Aforementioned as higher up. | Yes | Yes | |
Texas | SB 339 (2015) HB 3703 (2019) | Aye | Yes, licensed by the Department of Public Safety. | Yeah, intractable epilepsy, incurable neurodegenerative disease, terminal cancer, multiple sclerosis, spasticity, ALS, autism. | No | "Low-THC Cannabis" with not more than than 0.5 percent by weight of tetrahydrocannabinols. | Yeah | Yes |
Utah (NEW comprehensive program canonical in 2018, included in table above) | HB 105 (2014) Hemp Extract Registration Act | Yeah | Not completely articulate, nonetheless it may allow higher education institutions to abound or cultivate industrial hemp. | Yes, intractable epilepsy that hasn't responded to iii or more than treatment options suggested by a neurologist. | No | "Hemp extracts" with less than .iii% THC past weight and at to the lowest degree 15% CBD by weight and contains no other psychoactive substances | Yep | Aye |
Virginia | HB 1445- no longer in effect | No | No in-country means of acquiring cannabis products. | Intractable epilepsy | No | Cannabis oils with at least fifteen% CBD or THC-A and no more than than v% THC. | Yes | Yes |
Wisconsin | AB 726 (2013 Human action 267) | No | Physicians and pharmacies with an investigational drug permit by the FDA could manipulate cannabidiol. Qualified patients would also be immune to access CBD from an out-of-state medical cannabis dispensary that allows for out-of-state patients to use their dispensaries also equally remove the products from the land. No in-land product/manufacturing machinery provided. | Seizure disorders | Exception to the definition of prohibited THC past state police, allows for possession of "cannabidiol in a form without a psychoactive outcome." THC or CBD levels are not defined. | No | Aye | |
Wyoming | HB 32 (2015) Supervised medical use of hemp extracts. Effective vii/1/2015 | Yep | No in-country production or purchase method defined. | Intractable epilepsy or seizure disorders | No | "Hemp extracts" with less than 0.3% THC and at least v% CBD by weight. | Yes | Yep |
*The links and resource are provided for information purposes just. NCSL does non endorse the views expressed in any of the manufactures linked from this page.
Additional Resources
- NCSL's Cannabis & Employment Laws page.
- NCSL'south Marijuana Deep Dive page featuring marijuana and cannabis laws on criminal justice, health and other resources.
- NCSL FY 2018 letter of the alphabet the LCJPS Committee sent to the Hill opposing the withholding of funding for country with medical marijuana laws:
NCSL FY 2018 CJS Appropriations Back up Letter. (May 16, 2017)
-
Land Marijuana Policy covered in Episode iv of NCSL's podcast, Our American States.
You lot can find it on our website or subscribe to the podcast in iTunes, Google Play or your favorite podcast app. - Comparisons of programs
- Comparing of all land medical marijuana programs with contact information. Prepared past the Network for Public Health Law as of February. 2019
- Comparison of state limited admission medical marijuana programs. Prepared past the Network for Public Health Law as of June 2018.
- "State-by-Country Medical Marijuana Laws" Marijuana Policy Project, 2019
- Finances/Tax information
- Regulating Marijuana: Taxes, Cyberbanking and Federal Laws, November 2015
- "State Medical Marijuana Programs' Financial Information," Marijuana Policy Project, July 2015
- "Medical Marijuana Clinic Laws: Fees and Taxes," Marijuana Policy Projection
- Colorado Marijuana Sales and Tax Reports (updated monthly)
- Washington State Sales and Tax Information (updated weekly)
- "Taxing Marijuana: The Washington and Colorado Feel," Tax Foundation, Baronial 2014
- Law enforcement/crime information
- "What Law Enforcement Tin can Learn from Marijuana Legalization in Colorado," Prepared by American Armed forces Academy, March, 2015
- Statement by ONDCP Director Gil Kerlikowske regarding Federal guidelines for medical marijuana prosecution
- Medical marijuana inquiry and reports
- The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Electric current Land of Evidence and Recommendations for Research, 2017
- "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Scientific discipline Base," Institute of Medicine, 1999
- "Exposing the Myth of Smoked Medical Marijuana," U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
- Treatment Enquiry Establish'south (TRI) policy position statement regarding medical marijuana
- ProCon.org'southward resource on medical marijuana. Medical Marijuana ProCon.org presents laws, studies, statistics, surveys, authorities reports, and pro and con statements on questions related to marijuana as medicine
- "Becoming a State-Authorized Patient," Americans for Safe Access
- Nonmedical/Developed Use information and news
- Regulating Marijuana: Taxes, Cyberbanking and Federal Laws, November 2015
- Regulating Marijuana: A Year and a Half In, NCSL, Oct 2015
- "State Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Selected Legal Issues." Congressional Research Service, April 2013
- Analysis of CO Amendment 64 (rec use initiative) past Colorado State University, April 2013
- Colorado Marijuana Sales and Tax Reports
- Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division Annual Update, February 2015
- Public Wellness Law Research Law Atlas: Recreational Marijuana Laws - Interactive Map
- Public health and youth information
- Marijuana Joins Smoke-Gratuitous Laws, State Legislatures, March 2013
- Regulating Recreational Use of Marijuana and the Role of Public Health Law Prepared by the Network for Public Health Constabulary
- Marijuana Bear upon on Public Health and Safety in Colorado: briefing by CO Association of Chiefs of Police, January fourteen-16, 2015
- Smart Colorado: Protecting youth from marijuana
- Interest groups, position statements, opinions, and model regulation examples
- SAM: Smart Approaches to Marijuana
- Smart Colorado: Protecting youth from marijuana
- Resources from the Public Health Institute
- Treatment Enquiry Institute's (TRI) policy position statement regarding medical marijuana
- National Families in Action: Marijuana Studies Program "Marijuana Study"
- "Medical Cannabis as a Tool to Combat Hurting and the Opioid Crisis: A Pattern for Land Policy" Americans for Safe Admission
- "State-past-State Medical Marijuana Laws" Marijuana Policy Project, 2016
- "Key Aspects of State and DC Medical Marijuana Laws," Marijuana Policy ProjectSave
- "Becoming a State-Authorized Patient," Americans for Rubber Access
- Brookings Institution: Colorado's Rollout of Legal Marijuana Is Succeeding
Source: https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-medical-marijuana-laws.aspx
0 Response to "Will Federal Government Know if You Get Mecial Recommendation"
Post a Comment